<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Pretraining on Ju Lin's AI Engineering Notebook</title><link>https://julin.ai/tags/pretraining/</link><description>Recent content in Pretraining on Ju Lin's AI Engineering Notebook</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://julin.ai/tags/pretraining/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Pretraining a Mini Kimi K3 for $252</title><link>https://julin.ai/field-notes/mini-k3/</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://julin.ai/field-notes/mini-k3/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Vizuara AI Labs trained a miniature Kimi K3 from scratch: 1.02B parameters, 145M active, 5B tokens, one H200, $252.35. Rather than simplify the architecture (like Karpathy&amp;rsquo;s microgpt), they kept &lt;a href="https://books.vizuara.ai/book/pretraining-a-mini-k3"&gt;Kimi K3&amp;rsquo;s MoE and attention design&lt;/a&gt; intact. They worked through expert collapse, data-mixing bugs, distributed-training bugs, kernels, and GPU utilization on a modern MoE architecture.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A few things worth noting:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;5B tokens is probably too little for a 1B model. The authors agree the run was budget constrained.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Beating GPT-2 isn&amp;rsquo;t particularly meaningful when Mini K3 has roughly 10× the parameters.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;MoE at this scale is debatable. A smaller dense model trained on more tokens would likely be better if the goal was capability.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That&amp;rsquo;s a surprisingly cheap way to learn pretraining.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>