<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Ju Lin's AI Engineering Notebook</title><link>https://julin.ai/</link><description>Recent content on Ju Lin's AI Engineering Notebook</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://julin.ai/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Pretraining a Mini Kimi K3 for $252</title><link>https://julin.ai/field-notes/mini-k3/</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://julin.ai/field-notes/mini-k3/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Vizuara AI Labs trained a miniature Kimi K3 from scratch: 1.02B parameters, 145M active, 5B tokens, one H200, $252.35. Rather than simplify the architecture, they kept &lt;a href="https://books.vizuara.ai/book/pretraining-a-mini-k3"&gt;Kimi K3&amp;rsquo;s MoE and attention design&lt;/a&gt; intact.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some pushback from the &lt;a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/"&gt;LocalLLaMA discussion&lt;/a&gt; is worth noting:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;5B tokens is probably too little for a 1B model. The authors agree the run was budget constrained.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Beating GPT-2 isn&amp;rsquo;t particularly meaningful when Mini K3 has roughly 10× the parameters.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;MoE at this scale is debatable. A smaller dense model trained on more tokens would likely be better if the goal was capability.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For $252, they worked through expert collapse, data-mixing bugs, distributed-training bugs, kernels, and GPU utilization on a modern MoE architecture.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>About</title><link>https://julin.ai/about/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://julin.ai/about/</guid><description>about</description></item></channel></rss>